Judicial rascality refers to the deliberate abuse of judicial power, where judges or courts act recklessly, capriciously, or unethically to circumvent the law. It describes a culture of lawlessness within the law, where the legal process is manipulated to serve ulterior or political motives rather than to uphold justice. Judicial impertinence, on the other hand, is a legal term describing a situation where a lower court judge brazenly disregards the authority, hierarchy, or express orders of a higher appellate court. It occurs when a judge proceeds to hear a case, deliver a conflicting judgment, or issue an order despite knowing that a higher court is already handling the matter or has e...
Politics
Travails of opposition leaders, parties and judicial rascality
Source: Sun News Online
Open Original Source
Login to continue into the member area for this article.
Join the Conversation
Login to Comment